Hi all.
Does somebody know the brand/model of the 3 ports directional coupler used in this video: https://www.crowdsupply.com/lime-micro/limesdr/updates/vna-pihpsdr
It seems a Mini Circuits one but I can’t read the model. I would like to read the specs/features/price/shipping.
Actually, I would prefer to get a link to some suggested design to build one for HF usage < 30 MHz.
I’ve found some designs on the web but all have 4 ports instead of 3. I’m not an expert, but would like to build one since I already got good results with my bandpass filter and TFD antenna.
Before you splash out on high-end parts like minicircuits, have a look at this… it’s surprisingly accurate given the price. https://www.ebay.co.uk/i/332052527822
…where I could get info on turns numbers and their effects, together with a drawing to wind a single binocular transformer to build the coupler:
Ever since I have a binocular core I would try to wind it as soon as I get some time
@modimo@gerryk : only info I’m still missing is about the proper port attenuation. I’m thinking to use N1 = N2 = 3 getting 9.57 dB coupling… would this be a proper value for this usage scenario?
This demo uses simplified method. If you want to obtain lab equipment grade performance you need to use two receiving channels. One to measure incident wave and one to measure reflected one. In lab equipment there are dual directional couplers for each port. One coupling to measure incident(reference) wave and one for reflected. In simplified case you assume incident wave is constant which is not true with more complex load.
Hello @gerryk .
I just wanted to tell you that I ordered the device you mentioned since after 5 days I did not manage to lock down some time to build one by myself.
I still want to do that for personal learning/satisfation. So will update this thread sooner or later
I’ve also found 2 interesting videos about this device with measurements:
Hi Mario… I didn’t. The pyLMS7002 API is sort of hard-coded to frequencies > 240MHz. I had initially thought it was just the VNA code that had the limitation, but it’s the Python API also. It seems that there is some hackage required to set the LO frequency to some arbitrarily low value, but such that the frequency range is within the sample rate, and do the necessary maths to generate a TX signal and receive it before processing out the phase/amplitude.
I started working on this, but since got distracted… and I now have a real VNA, so the impetus is not as strong.
I believe it should be relatively straightforward, but would take some time, since the documentation is pretty bad, and everything I have figured out is from reading the code.
@gerryk you’re right ! I forgot that previous posts in this thread actually mentioned some changes needed to the VNA scripts. Something that I probably started looking at when I was still waiting for the LimeSDR board.
I should grab and read the sources again. I’ve seen @M0GLO posts about the first 60 MHz and different tuning/scan approaches. In September I’ve used soapy_power to run scans at HF frequencies and also that SW had to be initially modified to work at HF. I guess there could be some hint there on how to work at HF in pyLMS7002 VNA scripts as well.
BTW, here are a couple of scans at HF showing some recent Sun radio emissions:
I’ve built one TFD antenna with 800 ohm termination + a 16:1 balun to match the 50 ohm low loss coax. The antenna is at about 2.8 m from the ground, temporarily held by 2" PVC pipes + vents. Will replace with bigger wood poles in the future.
The RX is a LimeSDR and I’ve built also a 15-30 MHz bandpass filter to shut-up the FM stations…
For the antenna I’ve followed the instructions published by Dave Typinski for the TFD array (4 TFD antennas to get left and right polarization).
I currently have just one TFD but hope to step up to 2 in a crossed dipole and then possibly to the full 4 elements configuration. Time availability is the real issue…
I’ve given up on trying to get LimeAPI working (see above) and switched over to libusb which at least allows me to run the scripts. I have made several passes against a chinese 900MHz-ish dipole and the results I’m seeing don’t appear to be working correctly. Specifically, my SWR and Smith charts are all over the place, and S11 > 0 near what should be the antenna’s tuned freq.